Pg. 1 of 29 • 284 results
Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-102840 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-102840, filed by Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt, LLP, on behalf of Oved Apparel. In written submissions and in a telephone conference between members of my staff and counsel for the protestant on January 6, 2004, the protestant claims the subject merchandise is eligible for preferential treatment under the AGOA. The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of eight entries of men’s and boy’s knit pullovers under subheadings 6110.20.2065 and men’s knit shirts under subheading 6105.10.0010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
Application for Further Review of Protest No. 4601-03-102368
Request for Internal Advice; Protest No.: 4601-02-102954; Application for Further Review Not Requested; 19 C.F.R. 158.12; Defective Merchandise Allowance; Allowance in Value; 19 C.F.R. 158.11; Without Commercial Value at Time of Importation by Reason of Damage.
The tariff classification of marked/mutilated sample dresses from China
The tariff classification of truffles from Italy.
Further Review of Protest No. 4601-04-101411; Titanium tubesheets from Japan Dear Port Director:
The tariff classification of Tris (dimethylamino) phosphine, CAS # 1608-26-0, imported in bulk form, from England
Protest No. 4601-04-101505; Defective Merchandise; 19 CFR § 158.12(a)
Revocation of HRL 563328 dated December 29, 2005; Watch Production Incentive Certificate Program.
The tariff classification of frozen rhubarb from Poland
Pg. 1 of 29 • 284 results