§ 1395w–23.
(c)
Calculation of annual Medicare+Choice capitation rates
(1)
In general
For purposes of this part, subject to paragraphs (6)(C) and (7), each annual Medicare+Choice capitation rate, for a Medicare+Choice payment area that is an MA local area for a contract year consisting of a calendar year, is equal to the largest of the amounts specified in the following subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D):
(A)
Blended capitation rate
For a year before 2005, the sum of—
(i)
the area-specific percentage (as specified under paragraph (2) for the year) of the annual area-specific Medicare+Choice capitation rate for the Medicare+Choice payment area, as determined under paragraph (3) for the year, and
(ii)
the national percentage (as specified under paragraph (2) for the year) of the input-price-adjusted annual national Medicare+Choice capitation rate, as determined under paragraph (4) for the year,
multiplied (for a year other than 2004) by the budget neutrality adjustment factor determined under paragraph (5).
(B)
Minimum amount
12 multiplied by the following amount:
(i)
For 1998, $367 (but not to exceed, in the case of an area outside the 50 States and the District of Columbia, 150 percent of the annual per capita rate of payment for 1997 determined under
section 1395mm(a)(1)(C) of this title for the area).
(ii)
For 1999 and 2000, the minimum amount determined under clause (i) or this clause, respectively, for the preceding year, increased by the national per capita Medicare+Choice growth percentage described in paragraph (6)(A) applicable to 1999 or 2000, respectively.
(iii)
(I)
Subject to subclause (II), for 2001, for any area in a Metropolitan Statistical Area with a population of more than 250,000, $525, and for any other area $475.
(II)
In the case of an area outside the 50 States and the District of Columbia, the amount specified in this clause shall not exceed 120 percent of the amount determined under clause (ii) for such area for 2000.
(iv)
For 2002, 2003, and 2004, the minimum amount specified in this clause (or clause (iii)) for the preceding year increased by the national per capita Medicare+Choice growth percentage, described in paragraph (6)(A) for that succeeding year.
(C)
Minimum percentage increase
(ii)
For 1999 and 2000, 102 percent of the annual Medicare+Choice capitation rate under this paragraph for the area for the previous year.
(iii)
For 2001, 103 percent of the annual Medicare+Choice capitation rate under this paragraph for the area for 2000.
(iv)
For 2002 and 2003, 102 percent of the annual Medicare+Choice capitation rate under this paragraph for the area for the previous year.
(v)
For 2004 and each succeeding year, the greater of—
(I)
102 percent of the annual MA capitation rate under this paragraph for the area for the previous year; or
(II)
the annual MA capitation rate under this paragraph for the area for the previous year increased by the national per capita MA growth percentage, described in paragraph (6) for that succeeding year, but not taking into account any adjustment under paragraph (6)(C) for a year before 2004.
(D)
100 percent of fee-for-service costs
(iii)
Inclusion of costs of VA and DOD military facility services to medicare-eligible beneficiaries
(2)
Area-specific and national percentages
For purposes of paragraph (1)(A)—
(A)
for 1998, the “area-specific percentage” is 90 percent and the “national percentage” is 10 percent,
(B)
for 1999, the “area-specific percentage” is 82 percent and the “national percentage” is 18 percent,
(C)
for 2000, the “area-specific percentage” is 74 percent and the “national percentage” is 26 percent,
(D)
for 2001, the “area-specific percentage” is 66 percent and the “national percentage” is 34 percent,
(E)
for 2002, the “area-specific percentage” is 58 percent and the “national percentage” is 42 percent, and
(F)
for a year after 2002, the “area-specific percentage” is 50 percent and the “national percentage” is 50 percent.
(3)
Annual area-specific Medicare+Choice capitation rate
(A)
In general
For purposes of paragraph (1)(A), subject to subparagraphs (B) and (E), the annual area-specific Medicare+Choice capitation rate for a Medicare+Choice payment area—
(i)
for 1998 is, subject to subparagraph (D), the annual per capita rate of payment for 1997 determined under
section 1395mm(a)(1)(C) of this title for the area, increased by the national per capita Medicare+Choice growth percentage for 1998 (described in paragraph (6)(A)); or
(ii)
for a subsequent year is the annual area-specific Medicare+Choice capitation rate for the previous year determined under this paragraph for the area, increased by the national per capita Medicare+Choice growth percentage for such subsequent year.
(B)
Removal of medical education from calculation of adjusted average per capita cost
(ii)
Applicable percent
For purposes of clause (i), the applicable percent for—
(I)
1998 is 20 percent,
(II)
1999 is 40 percent,
(III)
2000 is 60 percent,
(IV)
2001 is 80 percent, and
(V)
a succeeding year is 100 percent.
(C)
Payment adjustment
(i)
In general
Subject to clause (ii), the payment adjustments described in this subparagraph are payment adjustments which the Secretary estimates were payable during 1997—
(I)
for the indirect costs of medical education under
section 1395ww(d)(5)(B) of this title, and
(II)
for direct graduate medical education costs under
section 1395ww(h) of this title.
(ii)
Treatment of payments covered under State hospital reimbursement system
(D)
Treatment of areas with highly variable payment rates
(E)
Inclusion of costs of DOD and VA military facility services to Medicare-eligible beneficiaries
(4)
Input-price-adjusted annual national Medicare+Choice capitation rate
(A)
In general
For purposes of paragraph (1)(A), the input-price-adjusted annual national Medicare+Choice capitation rate for a Medicare+Choice payment area for a year is equal to the sum, for all the types of medicare services (as classified by the Secretary), of the product (for each such type of service) of—
(i)
the national standardized annual Medicare+Choice capitation rate (determined under subparagraph (B)) for the year,
(ii)
the proportion of such rate for the year which is attributable to such type of services, and
(iii)
an index that reflects (for that year and that type of services) the relative input price of such services in the area compared to the national average input price of such services.
In applying clause (iii), the Secretary may, subject to subparagraph (C), apply those indices under this subchapter that are used in applying (or updating) national payment rates for specific areas and localities.
(B)
National standardized annual Medicare+ÐChoice capitation rate
(i)
the sum (for all Medicare+Choice payment areas) of the product of—
(I)
the annual area-specific Medicare+ÐChoice capitation rate for that year for the area under paragraph (3), and
(II)
the average number of medicare beneficiaries residing in that area in the year, multiplied by the average of the risk factor weights used to adjust payments under subsection (a)(1)(A) for such beneficiaries in such area; divided by
(ii)
the sum of the products described in clause (i)(II) for all areas for that year.
(C)
Special rules for 1998
In applying this paragraph for 1998—
(i)
medicare services shall be divided into 2 types of services: part A services and part B services;
(ii)
the proportions described in subparagraph (A)(ii)—
(I)
for part A services shall be the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the national average annual per capita rate of payment for part A for 1997 to the total national average annual per capita rate of payment for parts A and B for 1997, and
(II)
for part B services shall be 100 percent minus the ratio described in subclause (I);
(iii)
for part A services, 70 percent of payments attributable to such services shall be adjusted by the index used under
section 1395ww(d)(3)(E) of this title to adjust payment rates for relative hospital wage levels for hospitals located in the payment area involved;
(iv)
for part B services—
(I)
66 percent of payments attributable to such services shall be adjusted by the index of the geographic area factors under
section 1395w–4(e) of this title used to adjust payment rates for physicians’ services furnished in the payment area, and
(II)
of the remaining 34 percent of the amount of such payments, 40 percent shall be adjusted by the index described in clause (iii); and
(v)
the index values shall be computed based only on the beneficiary population who are 65 years of age or older and who are not determined to have end stage renal disease.
The Secretary may continue to apply the rules described in this subparagraph (or similar rules) for 1999.
(5)
Payment adjustment budget neutrality factor
(6)
“National per capita Medicare+Choice growth percentage” defined
(B)
Adjustment
The number of percentage points specified in this subparagraph is—
(i)
for 1998, 0.8 percentage points,
(ii)
for 1999, 0.5 percentage points,
(iii)
for 2000, 0.5 percentage points,
(iv)
for 2001, 0.5 percentage points,
(v)
for 2002, 0.3 percentage points, and
(vi)
for a year after 2002, 0 percentage points.
(C)
Adjustment for over or under projection of national per capita Medicare+Choice growth percentage
(7)
Adjustment for national coverage determinations and legislative changes in benefits
(k)
Determination of applicable amount for purposes of calculating the benchmark amounts
(1)
Applicable amount defined
For purposes of subsection (j), subject to paragraphs (2), (4), and (5), the term “applicable amount” means for an area—
(A)
for 2007—
(i)
if such year is not specified under subsection (c)(1)(D)(ii), an amount equal to the amount specified in subsection (c)(1)(C) for the area for 2006—
(I)
first adjusted by the rescaling factor for 2006 for the area (as made available by the Secretary in the announcement of the rates on April 4, 2005, under subsection (b)(1), but excluding any national adjustment factors for coding intensity and risk adjustment budget neutrality that were included in such factor); and
(II)
then increased by the national per capita MA growth percentage, described in subsection (c)(6) for 2007, but not taking into account any adjustment under subparagraph (C) of such subsection for a year before 2004;
(ii)
if such year is specified under subsection (c)(1)(D)(ii), an amount equal to the greater of—
(I)
the amount determined under clause (i) for the area for the year; or
(II)
the amount specified in subsection (c)(1)(D) for the area for the year; and
(B)
for a subsequent year—
(i)
if such year is not specified under subsection (c)(1)(D)(ii), an amount equal to the amount determined under this paragraph for the area for the previous year (determined without regard to paragraphs (2), (4), and (5)), increased by the national per capita MA growth percentage, described in subsection (c)(6) for that succeeding year, but not taking into account any adjustment under subparagraph (C) of such subsection for a year before 2004; and
(ii)
if such year is specified under subsection (c)(1)(D)(ii), an amount equal to the greater of—
(I)
the amount determined under clause (i) for the area for the year; or
(II)
the amount specified in subsection (c)(1)(D) for the area for the year.
(2)
Phase-out of budget neutrality factor
(A)
In general
Except as provided in subparagraph (D), in the case of 2007 through 2010, the applicable amount determined under paragraph (1) shall be multiplied by a factor equal to 1 plus the product of—
(i)
the percent determined under subparagraph (B) for the year; and
(ii)
the applicable phase-out factor for the year under subparagraph (C).
(B)
Percent determined
(ii)
Numerator based on difference between demographic rate and risk rate
(I)
In general
(II)
Demographic rate
(III)
Risk rate
(iii)
Denominator based on risk rate
(iv)
Requirements
In estimating the amounts under the previous clauses, the Secretary shall—
(I)
use a complete set of the most recent and representative Medicare Advantage risk scores under subsection (a)(3) that are available from the risk adjustment model announced for the year;
(II)
adjust the risk scores to reflect changes in treatment and coding practices in the fee-for-service sector;
(III)
adjust the risk scores for differences in coding patterns between Medicare Advantage plans and providers under the original Medicare fee-for-service program under parts A and B to the extent that the Secretary has identified such differences, as required in subsection (a)(1)(C);
(IV)
as necessary, adjust the risk scores for late data submitted by Medicare Advantage organizations;
(V)
as necessary, adjust the risk scores for lagged cohorts; and
(VI)
as necessary, adjust the risk scores for changes in enrollment in Medicare Advantage plans during the year.
(C)
Applicable phase-out factor
For purposes of subparagraph (A)(ii), the term “applicable phase-out factor” means—
(iii)
for 2009, 0.25; and
(D)
Termination of application
(3)
No revision in percent
(4)
Phase-out of the indirect costs of medical education from capitation rates
(B)
Percentages defined
For purposes of this paragraph:
(i)
Phase-in percentage
The term “phase-in percentage” means, for an area for a year, the ratio (expressed as a percentage, but in no case greater than 100 percent) of—
(I)
the maximum cumulative adjustment percentage for the year (as defined in clause (ii)); to
(II)
the standardized IME cost percentage (as defined in clause (iii)) for the area and year.
(ii)
Maximum cumulative adjustment percentage
The term “maximum cumulative adjustment percentage” means, for—
(I)
2010, 0.60 percent; and
(II)
a subsequent year, the maximum cumulative adjustment percentage for the previous year increased by 0.60 percentage points.
(iii)
Standardized IME cost percentage
(C)
Fee-for-service amount
(5)
Exclusion of costs for kidney acquisitions from capitation rates
(l)
Application of eligible professional incentives for certain MA organizations for adoption and meaningful use of certified EHR technology
(2)
Eligible professional described
With respect to a qualifying MA organization, an eligible professional described in this paragraph is an eligible professional (as defined for purposes of section 1395w–4(o) of this title) who—
(A)
(i)
is employed by the organization; or
(ii)
(I)
is employed by, or is a partner of, an entity that through contract with the organization furnishes at least 80 percent of the entity’s Medicare patient care services to enrollees of such organization; and
(II)
furnishes at least 80 percent of the professional services of the eligible professional covered under this subchapter to enrollees of the organization; and
(B)
furnishes, on average, at least 20 hours per week of patient care services.
(3)
Eligible professional incentive payments
(B)
Avoiding duplication of payments
(i)
In general
In the case of an eligible professional described in paragraph (2)—
(I)
that is eligible for the maximum incentive payment under section 1395w–4(o)(1)(A) of this title for the same payment period, the payment incentive shall be made only under such section and not under this subsection; and
(II)
that is eligible for less than such maximum incentive payment for the same payment period, the payment incentive shall be made only under this subsection and not under section 1395w–4(o)(1)(A) of this title.
(ii)
Methods
In the case of an eligible professional described in paragraph (2) who is eligible for an incentive payment under section 1395w–4(o)(1)(A) of this title but is not described in clause (i) for the same payment period, the Secretary shall develop a process—
(I)
to ensure that duplicate payments are not made with respect to an eligible professional both under this subsection and under section 1395w–4(o)(1)(A) of this title; and
(II)
to collect data from Medicare Advantage organizations to ensure against such duplicate payments.
(C)
Fixed schedule for application of limitation on incentive payments for all eligible professionals
(4)
Payment adjustment
(B)
Specified percent
The percent specified under this subparagraph for a year is 100 percent minus a number of percentage points equal to the product of—
(ii)
the Medicare physician expenditure proportion specified in subparagraph (C) for the year.
(C)
Medicare physician expenditure proportion
(D)
Application of payment adjustment
(5)
Qualifying MA organization defined
(6)
Meaningful EHR user attestation
For purposes of this subsection and subsection (m), a qualifying MA organization shall submit an attestation, in a form and manner specified by the Secretary which may include the submission of such attestation as part of submission of the initial bid under section 1395w–24(a)(1)(A)(iv)
of this title, identifying—
(A)
whether each eligible professional described in paragraph (2), with respect to such organization is a meaningful EHR user (as defined in section 1395w–4(o)(2) of this title) for a year specified by the Secretary; and
(B)
whether each eligible hospital described in subsection (m)(1),
5
So in original. Probably should be “(m)(2),”.
with respect to such organization, is a meaningful EHR user (as defined in
section 1395ww(n)(3) of this title) for an applicable period specified by the Secretary.
(7)
Posting on website
The Secretary shall post on the Internet website of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, in an easily understandable format, a list of the names, business addresses, and business phone numbers of—
(A)
each qualifying MA organization receiving an incentive payment under this subsection for eligible professionals of the organization; and
(B)
the eligible professionals of such organization for which such incentive payment is based.
(8)
Limitation on review
(A)
the methodology and standards for determining payment amounts and payment adjustments under this subsection, including avoiding duplication of payments under paragraph (3)(B) and the specification of rules for the fixed schedule for application of limitation on incentive payments for all eligible professionals under paragraph (3)(C);
(B)
the methodology and standards for determining eligible professionals under paragraph (2); and
(C)
the methodology and standards for determining a meaningful EHR user under section 1395w–4(
o)(2) of this title, including specification of the means of demonstrating meaningful EHR use under section 1395w–4(
o)(3)(C)
6
So in original. Probably should be “1395w–4(
o)(2)(C)”.
of this title and selection of measures under section 1395w–4(
o)(3)(B)
7
So in original. Probably should be “1395w–4(
o)(2)(B)”.
of this title.
(o)
Applicable percentage quality increases
(1)
In general
Subject to the succeeding paragraphs, in the case of a qualifying plan with respect to a year beginning with 2012, the applicable percentage under subsection (n)(2)(B) shall be increased on a plan or contract level, as determined by the Secretary—
(A)
for 2012, by 1.5 percentage points;
(B)
for 2013, by 3.0 percentage points; and
(C)
for 2014 or a subsequent year, by 5.0 percentage points.
(2)
Increase for qualifying plans in qualifying counties
(3)
Qualifying plans and qualifying county defined; application of increases to low enrollment and new plans
For purposes of this subsection:
(A)
Qualifying plan
(ii)
Application of increases to low enrollment plans
(I)
2012
(II)
2013 and subsequent years
(iii)
Application of increases to new plans
(I)
In general
A new MA plan that meets criteria specified by the Secretary shall be treated as a qualifying plan, except that in applying paragraph (1), the applicable percentage under subsection (n)(2)(B) shall be increased—
(aa)
for 2012, by 1.5 percentage points;
(bb)
for 2013, by 2.5 percentage points; and
(cc)
for 2014 or a subsequent year, by 3.5 percentage points.
(II)
New MA plan defined
(B)
Qualifying county
The term “qualifying county” means, for a year, a county—
(i)
that has an MA capitation rate that, in 2004, was based on the amount specified in subsection (c)(1)(B) for a Metropolitan Statistical Area with a population of more than 250,000;
(ii)
for which, as of December 2009, of the Medicare Advantage eligible individuals residing in the county at least 25 percent of such individuals were enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans; and
(iii)
that has per capita fee-for-service spending that is lower than the national monthly per capita cost for expenditures for individuals enrolled under the original medicare fee-for-service program for the year.
(4)
Quality determinations for application of increase
(A)
Quality determination
(B)
Plans that failed to report
(C)
Special rule for first 3 plan years for plans that were converted from a reasonable cost reimbursement contract
(i)
such plan shall not be treated as a new MA plan (as defined in paragraph (3)(A)(iii)(II)); and
(ii)
in determining the star rating of the plan under subparagraph (A), to the extent that Medicare Advantage data for such plan is not available for a measure used to determine such star rating, the Secretary shall use data from the period in which such plan was a reasonable cost reimbursement contract.
(D)
Special rule to prevent the artificial inflation of star ratings after the consolidation of Medicare Advantage plans offered by a single organization
(i)
In general
If—
(I)
a Medicare Advantage organization has entered into more than one contract with the Secretary with respect to the offering of Medicare Advantage plans; and
(II)
on or after
January 1, 2019, the Secretary approves a request from the organization to consolidate the plans under one or more contract
8
So in original. Probably should be “contracts”.
(in this subparagraph referred to as a “closed contract”) with the plans offered under a separate contract (in this subparagraph referred to as the “continuing contract”);
with respect to the continuing contract, the Secretary shall adjust the quality rating under the 5-star rating system and any quality increase under this subsection and rebate amounts under
section 1395w–24 of this title to reflect an enrollment-weighted average of scores or ratings for the continuing and closed contracts, as determined appropriate by the Secretary.
(5)
Exception for PACE plans
(6)
Quality measurement at the plan level for SNPs
(B)
Considerations
Prior to applying quality measurement at the plan level under this paragraph, the Secretary shall—
(i)
take into consideration the minimum number of enrollees in a specialized MA plan for special needs individuals in order to determine if a statistically significant or valid measurement of quality at the plan level is possible under this paragraph;
(ii)
take into consideration the impact of such application on plans that serve a disproportionate number of individuals dually eligible for benefits under this subchapter and under subchapter XIX;
(iii)
if quality measures are reported at the plan level, ensure that MA plans are not required to provide duplicative information; and
(iv)
ensure that such reporting does not interfere with the collection of encounter data submitted by MA organizations or the administration of any changes to the program under this part as a result of the collection of such data.
(C)
Application
If the Secretary applies quality measurement at the plan level under this paragraph—
(i)
such quality measurement may include Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS), Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) measures and quality measures under part D; and
(7)
Determination of feasibility of quality measurement at the plan level for all MA plans
(A)
Determination of feasibility
(B)
Consideration of change
([Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531], title XVIII, § 1853, as added [Pub. L. 105–33, title IV, § 4001], Aug. 5, 1997, [111 Stat. 299]; amended [Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(6) [title V, §§ 511(a), 512, 514(a), 517]], Nov. 29, 1999, [113 Stat. 1536], 1501A–380, 1501A–382 to 1501A–384; [Pub. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(6) [title VI, §§ 601(a), 602(a), 603, 605(a), 606(a)(2)(A), 607, 608(a), 611(a)]], Dec. 21, 2000, [114 Stat. 2763], 2763A–554 to 2763A–559; [Pub. L. 107–188, title V, § 532(d)(1)], June 12, 2002, [116 Stat. 696]; [Pub. L. 108–173, title I, § 101(e)(3)(D)], title II, §§ 211(a)–(e)(1), 221(d)(1), (4), 222(d)–(f), (i), 237(b)(1), (2)(B), 241(b)(1), title VII, § 736(d)(1), title IX, § 900(e)(1)(G), Dec. 8, 2003, [117 Stat. 2151], 2176–2178, 2192, 2193, 2200–2202, 2204, 2212, 2213, 2220, 2357, 2371; [Pub. L. 109–171, title V, § 5301], Feb. 8, 2006,