CLA-2 RR:CR:GC 960544 PH

Port Director of Customs
477 Michigan Avenue, Suite 200
Detroit, Michigan 48226

RE: Internal Advice; BOOST nutritional energy drink; SUSTACAL; dietary supplement; beverage; other nonalcoholic beverage; other food preparation; ENs 21.06; 22.02; 22.06; 33.03; 33.04; HQs 952278; 952637; 956858; 082193; 085776; 086942; 088377; 088622; 089455

Dear Port Director:

This is our decision in response to your request dated April 8, 1997 (MAN-1-11:FO:CST 341 SFS), that we reconsider HQ 956858 dated January 23, 1995, ruling on the classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) of "BOOST", a nutritional energy drink produced by Mead Johnson & Company. We regret the delay in responding to your request.

FACTS:

The merchandise under consideration is described in HQ 956858 as follows:

[BOOST] is a moderate-calorie, high-protein, ready-to-drink beverage consumed by active people and those desiring a good source of energy and nutrients. It is a non-alcoholic water-based beverage containing sugar, corn syrup solids, milk protein concentrate, vegetable oils, vitamins, minerals, flavorings, emulsifiers and other ingredients. [BOOST] contains the three essential macronutrients (protein, fat, and carbohydrate) and all the essential vitamins and minerals for it to be considered "nutritionally complete." Each eight ounce can provides at least 20 percent of the U.S. RDAs for protein and all vitamins and minerals. [BOOST] will be imported from Canada and sold primarily in four-packs. [BOOST] will be supplied in the following four flavors: chocolate, mocha (coffee), vanilla, and strawberry.

We concluded in HQ 956858 that BOOST "... is a beverage, a liquid for drinking [and that it] is not intended to be a regular diet or ingested in lieu of meals[;] [rather] [i]t is merely a beverage to satisfy the empty feeling of an active adult who may miss a meal because of that person's busy lifestyle." Consistent with this conclusion, we held that "... BOOST is classified as an other nonalcoholic beverage under subheading 2202.90.9090, HTSUS."

You suggest that BOOST should be classified under subheading 2106.90.6097 (now 2106.90.99), HTSUS, as an other food preparation not elsewhere specified or included, on the basis that it is "categorically the same food nutritional supplement" as "SUSTACAL," produced by the maker of BOOST.

In HQ 088622 dated May 24, 1991, SUSTACAL was held to be properly classified in subheading 2106.90.6097, HTSUS. HQ 088662 describes SUSTACAL as:

[A] nutritionally complete, ready to use liquid food. It is stated to be formulated to meet the supplemental or total nutritional needs of patients who, for a variety of reasons, have difficulty in meeting their nutritional requirements through a normal diet. The product may be ingested or administered orally or by a feeding tube. It is lactose free and contains fiber, numerous nutriments, vitamins and minerals.

You also cite HQs 952278 dated January 26, 1993, 082193 dated February 2, 1989, 085776 dated June 28, 1991, and 089455 dated January 6, 1992, in support for the proposition that "similar liquid nutritional food products which may not be taken in unlimited quantities ... are properly classified under heading 2106."

The subheadings under consideration are as follows:

2202.90.90 Waters, including mineral waters and aerated waters, containing added sugar or other sweetening matter or flavored, and other nonalcoholic beverages, not including fruit or vegetable juices of heading 2009: ... Other: ... Other.

The 1998 general column one rate of duty for goods classifiable under this provision is 0.2›/liter.

2106.90.99 Food preparations not elsewhere specified or included: ... Other: ... Other: ... Other: ... Other: ... Other.

The 1998 general column one rate of duty for goods classifiable under this provision is 7.6% ad valorem.

ISSUE:

Whether BOOST Nutritional Energy Drink is classifiable as an other nonalcoholic beverage in subheading 2202.90.90, HTSUS, or as other food preparations in subheading 2106.90.99, HTSUS.

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

Merchandise is classifiable under the HTSUS in accordance with the General Rules of Interpretation (GRIs). GRI 1 states in part that for legal purposes, classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and any relative section or chapter notes, and provided the headings or notes do not require otherwise, according to GRIs 2 through 6. The Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System Explanatory Notes (ENs) constitute the official interpretation of the Harmonized System. While not legally binding, and therefore not dispositive, the ENs provide a commentary on the scope of each heading of the Harmonized System and are thus useful in ascertaining the classification of merchandise under the System. Customs believes the ENs should always be consulted. See T.D. 89-80, 54 Fed. Reg. 35127, 35128 (Aug. 23, 1989).

EN 21.06 provides, in part, that:

Provided that they are not covered by any other heading of the Nomenclature, this heading covers ... (16) Preparations, often referred to as food supplements, based on extracts from plants, fruit concentrates, honey, fructose, etc. and containing added vitamins and sometimes minute quantities of iron compounds. These preparations are often put up in packagings with indications that they maintain general health or well-being. Similar preparations, however, intended for the prevention or treatment of diseases or ailments are excluded (heading 30.03 or 30.04).

EN 22.02 provides, in part, that:

Other non-alcoholic beverages, not including fruit or vegetable juices of heading 20.09 ... includes ... (2) Certain other beverages ready for consumption, such as those with a basis of milk and cocoa. This heading does not include: ... (d) Medicaments of heading 30.03 or 30.04.

The ENs for headings 3003 and 3004, cited in the above quotations from ENs 21.06 and 22.02, provide, in part, as follows:

Further this heading excludes food supplements containing vitamins or mineral salts which are put up for the purpose of maintaining health or well-being but have no indication as to use for the prevention or treatment of any disease or ailment. These products which are usually in liquid form but may also be put up in powder or tablet form, are generally classified in heading 21.06 or Chapter 22.

Thus, according to these ENs, food supplements such as BOOST or SUSTACAL are generally classified in either heading 2106 or Chapter 22, HTSUS (see also, EN 22.06, which provides that the beverages covered by that heading "... may also contain added vitamins or iron compounds [and] are sometimes referred to as food supplements' ... designed to maintain general health or well-being").

In HQ 082193, we held "NUTREN", "REPLETE", and "PEPTAMEN" to be classifiable as other food preparations in subheading 2106.90.60, HTSUS. HQ 082193 described the merchandise as follows:

[The products] are designed to be taken only under medical supervision and on a temporary basis by medical patients with impaired nutritional status. These products can be administered orally or by a feeding tube. ... All three formulas are described in the literature as complete liquid nutrition suitable for various clinical indications ... All three formulas meet or exceed the U.S. Recommended Daily Allowances for vitamins and minerals. ...

In HQ 085776, we reconsidered and affirmed HQ 082193 insofar as PEPTAMEN is concerned, again holding PEPTAMEN to be classifiable as an other food preparation in subheading 2106.90.60, HTSUS. HQ 085776 described the merchandise as:

... [C]omposed of protein, vitamins and trace elements in 2,000 calories, and described as a ready-to-use, isotonic, complete, peptide-based, elemental diet [the HOLDING added that the merchandise is "... a complete nutritional liquid diet for the critically ill patient ..."].

In HQ 089455, we held "ACCUPEP HPF" to be classifiable as an other food preparation in subheading 2106.90.60, HTSUS. HQ 089455 described the merchandise as:

[O]ffering the benefits of a nutritionally complete elemental formula with short-chain peptides as the primary protein source, as well as other nutrients, such as calories, fats and carbohydrates. It is prepared in powder form and said to consist of maltodextrin, hydrolyzed lactalbumin, corn oil, and numerous vitamins and minerals. It is to be mixed with water and is suitable for either oral or tube feeding. The suggested usage is said to be for the nutritional management of patients with short bowel syndrome, Crohn's disease and pancreatic insufficiency, as well as patients and others undergoing radiation therapy in the GI tract.

In HQ 952278 (followed in HQ 952637 dated February 4, 1993), we held "FLORIDIX" or "FLORAVITAL" brand herbal and vitamin products, grouped in the categories of iron and herb products, multivitamins, and herbal rest products, to be classifiable as other food preparations in subheading 2106.90.60, HTSUS. In the case of the first category, the classification was based on the fact that the products primarily consist of herbal extracts and fruit concentrates, contain added vitamins, and maintain general health or well-being. In the case of the second category, the significant quantity of herbal extract, fruit concentrate, and other non-vitamin ingredients included in the product led to the finding that the products are not simply vitamins. In the case of the third category, the holding was based on the fact that the product primarily contains flavoring agents and other substances, in addition to various herbs, and appears to be a dietary supplement.

In HQ 950917 dated May 11, 1992, we held "ALACTAMIL", described as being "designed for infants who exhibit a lactose intolerance, and ... intended as a complete nutritional source, or as a breast milk supplement, from birth to age one[,]" to be classifiable as an other food preparation in subheading 2106.90.60, HTSUS. The basis of the ruling was that "... since [ALACTAMIL] is intended as a food product, one to be used to supplement or supplant an infant's normal diet, it is something more than a beverage. It is a food. Therefore, heading 2202, HTSUS, would not apply."

HQ 086942 dated November 14, 1990, concerned "LIPOVITAN", described as a "healthful vitamin drink [intended] for [the] prevention of deficiencies of niacin, vitamin B-1, vitamin B-2, and vitamin B-6." Each label bore the statement "Suggested use: Drink entire bottleful, one time daily." The product was further described as a "vitamin supplement or tonic beverage" and as a "health drink." We held the product to be classifiable as an other food preparation in subheading 2106.90.60, HTSUS.

In HQ 088377 dated May 4, 1992, we reconsidered and modified HQ 086942, holding LIPOVITAN to be classifiable as an other nonalcoholic beverage in subheading 2202.90.90, HTSUS. The bases for this decision were:

... The product is advertised as a refreshing drink; one which "makes you feel good all over after athletic activities or hard work." The fact that it contains a large quantity of vitamins does not necessarily make it any less a beverage, since judging from the contents, it is a sweetened drink; one intended to be refreshing. ... [T]he product is marketed as a refreshing drink. While it may contain a large quantity of vitamins, it is also a sweetened drink. Although the label suggestion, "drink one entire bottle each day" was interpreted [in HQ 086942] as a dosage limitation, it can just as well be viewed as an invitation to be sure to drink at least one bottle a day. ... Conclusions: [LIPOVITAN], marketed as a refreshing, healthful vitamin drink, is a beverage. While it may be designed to replenish the imbiber's vitamin supply, it is also intended to be the "pause that refreshes", a primary function of a beverage. All in all the main purpose of this drink is no different than that of many other chilled, sweetened beverages: to slake one's thirst after arduous activity.

Customs interpretation of this matter, as demonstrated by these rulings, is consistent with the competing HTSUS provisions and the applicable ENs. That is, heading 2106 covers food preparations not elsewhere specified or included, and EN 21.06 contains an explicit proviso that the merchandise covered therein, including food supplements, may not be covered by any other heading of the Nomenclature. Accordingly, merchandise which the available evidence indicates to be intended to function primarily as a beverage must be classified as such, in heading 2202, regardless of whether the merchandise may also be intended "to replenish the imbiber's vitamin supply." We so held in regard to LIPOVITAN (see HQs 086942 and 088377, above). When there is no such evidence, and the merchandise appears to be primarily intended to function as a food supplement and not as a beverage, we have held the merchandise to be classifiable as an other food preparation in heading 2106 because it is not elsewhere specified or included (see HQs 082193, 085776, 089455, 952278, and 950917).

The classification of BOOST as an other nonalcoholic beverage under subheading 2202.90.90, HTSUS, is consistent with the other rulings. Just as in the case of LIPOVITAN, BOOST is advertised as a refreshing drink (the label describes it as available in "four delicious flavors"); "it is a sweetened drink; one intended to be refreshing" (quoting from HQ 088377 regarding LIPOVITAN, above). We affirm the holding in HQ 956858 that BOOST is a beverage, and is classifiable as an other nonalcoholic beverage under subheading 2202.90.90, HTSUS.

In the case of SUSTACAL, on the other hand, according to the available information at the time of issuance of HQ 088662, the merchandise had been sold only in hospitals and nursing homes in the United States, and had not even been marketed directly to the consumer. The merchandise was described as "a nutritionally complete, ready to use liquid food ... formulated to meet the supplemental or total nutritional needs of patients who ... have difficulty in meeting their nutritional requirements through a normal diet." The label in the file for HQ 088662, rather than emphasizing the function of the merchandise as "a refreshing drink" (see above), describes the merchandise as a "nutritionally complete liquid food", and does not even refer to the taste or "refreshing" nature of the merchandise.

(Further, although this is not the principal basis for our conclusion, we note that the BOOST and SUSTACAL are not "categorically the same food nutritional supplement[s][.]" A side-by-side comparison of the nutrient values of each product and the labels for each product demonstrate substantial differences in the nutrient values, with large differences in fat and protein contents.)

HOLDING:

BOOST Nutritional Energy Drink is classifiable as an other nonalcoholic beverage in subheading 2202.90.90, HTSUS.

EFFECTS ON OTHER RULINGS:

HQ 956858 dated January 23, 1995, is affirmed.

No later than 60 days from the date of this letter the Office of Regulations and Rulings will take steps to make the decision available to Customs personnel via the Customs Rulings Module in ACS and to the public via the Diskette Subscription Service, the Freedom of Information Act, and other public access channels.

Sincerely,

John Durant
Director, General
Classification Division