CLA-2 RR:TC:TE 959676

Ms. Maureen Shoule
J.W. Hampton, Jr. & Co., Inc.
15 Park Row
New York, NY 10038

RE: Country of origin determination for backpacks and duffel bags; Section 102.21(c)(4); HQ 959417 of July 26, 1996; HQ 959669 of September 26, 1996 and HQ 959842 of October 29, 1996 Dear Ms. Shoule:

On July 25, 1996, we issued Headquarters Ruling Letter (HQ) 959427, in which we provided to you, on behalf of Access Bag N'Pack, a classification and country of origin binding ruling concerning backpacks and duffel bags. In a letter to this office, dated August 21, 1996, on behalf of Access Bag N'Pack, you provided us with additional information concerning the country of origin issue. We have reviewed this information and are providing you with a new binding ruling on the country of origin of these products pursuant to 19 CFR 177.1 (d)(1).

FACTS:

The merchandise at issue is described as a backpack, style #76200, and a duffel bag, style # 20341, both having an outer surface of man-made fabric. A description of each item and their manufacturing operations are as follows:

BACKPACK- STYLE #76200 The backpack is designed in the manner of a traditional backpack. This design has two shoulder straps, a handle on the top of the backpack, a zipper opening that goes halfway around the backpack, a front pocket with a zipper opening and logo on the front of the backpack.

TAIWAN Materials are sourced (nylon, pvc sheeting, webbing, foam padding, zippers, thread, buckles and hangtags) Designs and dies are sourced

CHINA Cutting the material into component parts Sewing a logo to the front body panel Sewing a zipper to the side panel and the front pocket Sewing handle to top of the bag Sewing backstraps and attaching them to the back panel Sewing front pocket onto the front panel

TAIWAN Connect front panel to side panel and back panel Sew in country of origin label Trim the inside of the bag Turn the bag Cut loose threads and clean bag Package the bags into polybags/export cartons

DUFFEL BAG- STYLE # 20341

The duffel bag has a top zipper opening, two top handles, two shoulder straps, a large front pocket with a zipper opening and two large end panels, akin to large side compartments, that have a top zipper opening and a side zipper opening.

TAIWAN Materials are sourced (nylon, pvc sheeting, webbing, foam padding, zippers, thread, buckles and hangtags) Designs and dies are sourced CHINA Cutting the material into component parts Stitch handles to main body panel Sew body panel, lining and zipper together Sew shoulder straps/piping Stitch shoulder straps to end panels Sew front pocket and side pockets and attach zippers Attach side pockets onto end panels to form completed end panels

TAIWAN Connect the main body panel, end panels and front pocket Attach the country of origin label Stitch binding to cover inside seams Trim the inside of the bag

Turn the bag Cut loose threads and clean the bag Package the bag into polybags/export cartons

ISSUE:

What is the country of origin of the subject bags?

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

On December 8, 1994, the President signed into law the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. Section 334 of that Act, codified in 19 U.S.C. 3925, provides new rules of origin for textiles and apparel entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption, on and after July 1, 1996. On September 5, 1995, Customs published Section 102.21, Customs Regulations, in the Federal Register, implementing Section 334 (60 FR 46188). Thus, effective July 1, 1996, the country of origin of a textile or apparel product shall be determined by sequential application of the general rules set forth in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of Section 102.21.

Paragraph (c)(1) states that "The country of origin of a textile or apparel product is the single country, territory, or insular possession in which the good was wholly obtained or produced." As the subject merchandise is not wholly obtained or produced in a single country, territory, or insular possession, paragraph (c)(1) of Section 102.21 is inapplicable.

Paragraph (c)(2) states that "Where the country of origin of a textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the country of origin of the good is the single country, territory, or insular possession in which each foreign material incorporated in that good underwent an applicable change in tariff classification, and/or met any other requirement, specified for the good in paragraph (e) of this section."

Paragraph (e) states that "The following rules shall apply for purposes of determining the country of origin of a textile or apparel product under paragraph (c)(2) of this section:"

4202.92.15-4202.92.30 A change to subheading 4202.92.15 through 4202.92.30 from any other heading, provided that the change is the result of the good being wholly assembled in a single country, territory or insular possession.

Section 102.21(b)(6) defines wholly assembled as:

The term "wholly assembled" when used with reference to a good means that all components, of which there must be at least two, preexisted in essentially the same condition as found in the finished good and were combined to form the finished good in a single country, territory, or insular possession. Minor attachments and minor embellishments (for example, appliques, beads, spangles, embroidery, buttons) not appreciably affecting the identity of the good, and minor subassemblies (for example, collars, cuffs, plackets, pockets), will not affect the status of a good as "wholly assembled" in a single country, territory, or insular possession.

As stated in HQ 959427, the subject backpack and duffel bag are classifiable under subheading 4202.92.3020, HTSUS, and 4202.92.3030, HTSUS, respectively. While the cut fabric pieces and components imported from Taiwan into China are classifiable in a different heading than heading 4202, HTSUS, the bags are not wholly assembled in a single country, territory, or insular possession. Therefore, as the terms of the tariff shift rule are not met, this rule is inapplicable in this instance.

Paragraph (c)(3) states that "Where the country of origin of a textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph (c)(1) or (2) of this section":

(i) If the good was knit to shape, the country of origin of the good is the single country, territory, or insular possession in which the good was knit; or

(ii) Except for goods of heading 5609, 5807, 5811, 6213, 6214, 6301 through 6306, and 6308, and subheadings 6209.20.5040, 6307.10, 6307.90, and 9404.90, if the good was not knit to shape and the good was wholly assembled in a single country, territory, or insular possession, the country of origin of the good is the country, territory, or insular possession in which the good was wholly assembled.

As the subject articles are neither knit to shape nor wholly assembled in a single country, territory, or insular possession, Section 102.21(c)(3) is also inapplicable.

Section 102.21(c)(4) states that, "Where the country of origin of a textile or apparel product cannot be determined under paragraph (c) (1), (2) or (3) of this section, the country of origin of the good is the single country, territory, or insular possession in which the most important assembly or manufacturing process occurred." In the case of the instant backpack, in China, a logo is sewn to the front body panel, a zipper is sewn to the side panel and the front pocket, a handle is sewn at the top of the bag, the backstraps are attached to the back panel and the front pocket is sewn to the front panel. In Taiwan, the front panel, side panels and back panel are all sewn together. When evaluating the assembly operations in both countries, it appears that the assembly operations in Taiwan are the most important in accordance with Section 102.21(c)(4). This conclusion is in accord with HQ 959417, dated July 26, 1996, in which Customs also dealt with a country of origin determination for a backpack. In that case, the following operations were performed in China: the attachment of an interior pocket and a small exterior side pocket with zipper to the front panel and the joining of the lining to the component

pieces. The front panel, back panel, suede components, shoulder straps, gusset with zipper, and front pocket were assembled into a finished backpack in Taiwan. When we evaluated the assembly operations in both countries, pursuant to Section 102.21(c)(4), we determined that the assembly operations in Taiwan were the most important.

In the case of the duffel bag, the following operations occur in China: the handles are stitched to the main body panel, the body panel, lining and zipper are sewn together, the shoulder straps are stitched to the end panels, the front and side pockets are sewn and the side pockets are attached to form two completed end panels. In Taiwan, the main body panel and end panels are connected and a front pocket is sewn on. In evaluating the assembly operations in both countries, it appears that the assembly operations in China are the most important in accordance with Section 102.21(c)(4). This is in accord with HQ 959669, dated September 26, 1996, where Customs dealt with a country of origin determination for a nylon sports bag featuring a main body component and two gusset pockets (resembling side saddles), which were located on either side of the main body of the bag. The assembly operations in HQ 959669 are very similar to the operations in the instant case. For example in HQ 959669, the following operations took place in Taiwan: panels for the main body of the bag were joined together, including the zipper, the straps were sewn onto the back panel of the main body of the bag, straps were sewn into gusset pocket panels and panels of gusset pockets were sewn together, including zipper, to create side saddles. In China, the main body of the bag and the gusset pocket panels were sewn together. Pursuant to Section 102.21(c)(4), Customs determined that the country of origin was Taiwan. We note that the only difference between HQ 959669 and the instant case appears to be that in Taiwan a front pocket is also attached when the main body panel and end panels are connected. See also, HQ 959842, dated October 29, 1996, wherein Customs dealt with country of origin determinations for a number of styles of bags. In particular, we refer to style number AM94-9222, a large travel bag, that featured a front-gusseted zippered pocket with a small flat mesh pocket, zippered pockets at both ends of the bag, handles with a plastic adjuster, a shoulder strap, five stands at the bottom of the bag, and a logo on the fabric stripe at the front of the body of the bag. Pursuant to Section 102.21(c)(4), Customs determined that the country of origin was China where the following operations took place: the sewing of the U-shaped zipper closure at the top of the bag, the sewing of the double layer polypropylene handles and the polypropylene fabric strip on to the front and back panel, the sewing of the embossed logo to the front fabric strip, the sewing of the flat mesh pocket to the front pocket, sewing of the zipper onto the front pocket, sewing edges of side panels with zipper and sewing of the inside lining to side panels to create the side pockets.

HOLDING:

The country of origin for the backpack, style #76200, is Taiwan.

The country of origin for the duffel bag, style #20341, is China.

The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in section 19 C.F.R. 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, either directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect.

Should it be subsequently determined that the information furnished is not complete and does not comply with 19 C.F.R. 177.9(b)(1), the ruling will be subject to modification or revocation. In the event there is a change in the facts previously furnished, this may affect the determination of country of origin. Accordingly, if there is any change in the facts submitted to Customs, it is recommended that a new ruling request be submitted in accordance with 19 C.F.R. 177.2.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director
Tariff Classification Appeals
Division