CLA-2-87:OT:RR:NC:N2:201
Mr. Mike Ferris
Strader Ferris International
808 Commerce Park Drive
Ogdensburg, NY 13669-2208
RE: The tariff classification of a motorized wheelchair from China
Dear Mr. Ferris:
In your letter dated June 2, 2026, you requested a tariff classification ruling on behalf of your client, Travel
Buggy Inc., located in Edmonton, Canada.
The item under consideration, the Travel Buggy Model DASH (HP206), an electrically motorized
wheelchair. You provided an on-line brochure that indicates that the HP206 was designed with certain
features designed to accommodate the specific needs of chronically handicapped users. These features
include:
Programmable joystick.
Adjustable forward, reverse, and turn speeds.
Caregiver can fully operate the wheelchair
from a control position behind the user.
Hinged armrests designed to accommodate clear side
transfer to and from the seat.
Wheelchair frame designed with full
extension leg rests, enabling handicapped users to elevate one
or both legs.
Backrest has been designed with extended length for full back support.
Thicker headrest pad adds additional head support and comfort in upright seating
position.
Six-way tilting headrest.
Backrest equipped with tension straps, which can be tightened or loosened to accommodate individual
postural deviations and to manages pressure.
Footrest adapted to fold, and tuck in,
flush under the front seat structure which accommodates ease of movement to a bed,
seat or other user device.
The applicable subheading for the Travel Buggy Model DASH (HP206) will be 8713.90.0060, Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for “Carriages for disabled persons, whether
or not motorized or otherwise mechanically propelled: Other: Other.” The general rate of duty will be Free.
In your submission you requested consideration of secondary classification under 9817.00.96, HTSUS, which
applies to articles and parts of articles specifically designed or adapted for the use or benefit of the
permanently or chronically physically or mentally handicapped.
Subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS, covers: “Articles specially designed or adapted for the use or benefit of the
blind or other physically or mentally handicapped persons; parts and accessories (except parts and
accessories of braces and artificial limb prosthetics) that are specially designed or adapted for use in the
foregoing articles . . . Other.” The term “blind or other physically or mentally handicapped persons” includes
“any person suffering from a permanent or chronic physical or mental impairment which substantially limits
one or more major life activities, such as caring for oneself, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing,
hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, or working.” U.S. Note 4(a), Subchapter XVII, Chapter 98, HTSUS.
Subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS, excludes “(i) articles for acute or transient disability; (ii) spectacles,
dentures, and cosmetic articles for individuals not substantially disabled; (iii) therapeutic and diagnostic
articles; or (iv) medicine or drugs.” U.S. Note 4(b), Subchapter XVII, Chapter 98, HTSUS.
In Sigvaris, Inc. v. United States, 227 F. Supp 3d 1327, 1336 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2017), aff’d, 899 F.3d 1308
(Fed. Cir. 2018), the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) explained that “specially” means “to an extent
greater than in other cases or towards others” and “designed” means something that is “done, performed, or
made with purpose and intent often despite an appearance of being accidental, spontaneous, or natural.” We
must first evaluate “for whose, if anyone’s, use and benefit is the article specially designed,” and then,
whether “those persons [are] physically handicapped [].” Sigvaris, 899 F.3d at 1314.
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) clarified in Sigvaris, 899 F.3d at 1314-15 that to be
“specially designed,” the merchandise “must be intended for the use or benefit of a specific class of persons
to an extent greater than for the use or benefit of others” and adopted the five factors used by U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP):
1. the physical properties of the article itself (i.e., whether the article is easily distinguishable by
properties of the design, form, and the corresponding use specific to this unique design, from articles
useful to non-handicapped persons);
2. whether any characteristics are present that create a substantial probability of use by the chronically;
handicapped so that the article is easily distinguishable from articles useful to the general public and
any use thereof by the general public is so improbable that it would be fugitive;
3. whether articles are imported by manufacturers or distributors recognized or proven to be involved in
this class or kind of articles for the handicapped;
4. whether the articles are sold in specialty stores which serve handicapped individuals; and,
5. whether the condition of the articles at the time of importation indicates that these articles are for the
handicapped.
Based on the information supplied, the Travel Buggy Model DASH (HP206), does satisfy the 5 factors set
out by CBP. As a result, it is the opinion of this office that a secondary classification will apply in
subheading 9817.00.96, HTSUS.
The duties cited above are current as of this ruling’s issuance. Duty rates are provided for your convenience
and are subject to change. The text of the most recent HTSUS and the accompanying duty rates are provided
at https://hts.usitc.gov/.
This ruling does not address the applicability of any additional duties, taxes, fees, exactions and/or other
charges, which may apply to the goods discussed herein. This includes, but is not limited to, tariffs and other
duties as provided for in Subchapter III to Chapter 99, HTSUS. Thus, for example, in addition to the
classification stated above, the merchandise covered by this ruling may also need to be reported with either
the Chapter 99 provision under which an additional tariff applies or one of the Chapter 99 provisions
covering exceptions to such tariffs.
For further information to assist with the importation process, please refer to the frequently updated Cargo
Systems Messaging Service (CSMS) messages at
https://www.cbp.gov/trade/automated/cargo-systems-messaging-service and Frequently Asked Questions on
the Trade Remedy/IEEPA page at
https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/trade-remedies/IEEPA-FAQ.
The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as
identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the
information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and
complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not
conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2.
Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic
verification by CBP.
This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).
A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents
filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact
National Import Specialist Matthew Sullivan at [email protected].
Sincerely,
(for)
James P. Forkan
Director
National Commodity Specialist Division