OT:RR:NC:N1:113

Jessica Islas-Parker
A.N. Deringer, Inc.
173 West Service Rd.
Champlain, NY 12919

RE: The country of origin of male and female hose menders

Dear Ms. Islas-Parker:

In your letter dated April 7, 2026, you requested a country of origin ruling on male and female hose menders on behalf of your client, Meridian International Co., Ltd. Descriptions, technical information, and photographs were submitted with your request.

The items under consideration are a male hose mender and a female hose mender, which are connectors designed to be attached to non-industrial hoses that are used in residential gardening applications. Both items are predominately made of zinc. They each have a narrow barbed cylinder on one end, an octagonal bolt head in the middle, and a threaded cylindrical shaft on the other end. The male hose mender is threaded on the exterior of the shaft, and the female hose mender is threaded on the interior. In their finished state, they are also fitted with stainless steel clamps along their barbed ends.

In your submission, you provided a description of the production process. The raw materials to produce both mender types are from Cambodia, where they are forged and punched into their approximate shape and size. The menders are then shipped to China where they undergo machining processes and are fitted with accessories. This results in the final product, which is then packed in cartons and shipped to the United States.

When determining the country of origin, the substantial transformation analysis is applicable. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter (HQ) H301619, dated November 6, 2018. The test for determining whether a substantial transformation will occur is whether an article emerges from a process with a new name, character, or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. See Texas Instruments Inc. v. United States, 681 F.2d 778 (C.C.P.A. 1982). This determination is based on the totality of the evidence. See National Hand Tool Corp. v. United States, 16 C.I.T. 308 (1992), aff’d, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

The manufacturing processes used to produce the menders are similar to those of the fittings used for a corrugated connector described in New York Ruling N355143, dated October 22, 2025. Like the fittings, the menders are not fully functional in the country they are forged in, they are formed to the approximate shape and size of the finished product. After forging, the menders are shipped to China to undergo machining processes and preparing their surfaces for use. The machining and surface treatment for the menders in China do not constitute a substantial transformation because the menders retain the name, character, and use they acquired from the country in which they were forged. With the menders undergoing a similar process to that of the fittings in N355143, no new article emerges from the manufacturing processes in China. Accordingly, the country of origin of the male hose mender and the female hose mender is Cambodia.

The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs and Border Protection Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact National Import Specialist Matthew Gay at [email protected].
Sincerely,

(for)
James P. Forkan
Director
National Commodity Specialist Division