CLA-2-12:OT:RR:NC:N5:229

Mr. Stan Vick
Kuehne + Nagel Inc.
4100 North Commerce Drive
East Point, GA 30344

RE: The country of origin and marking of psyllium husk fiber

Dear Mr. Vick:

In your letter dated January 14, 2026, you requested a country of origin and marking ruling on psyllium husk fiber on behalf of your client, J. Rettenmaier USA LP.

A narrative description of the manufacturing process accompanied your letter.

You have outlined a scenario in which you plan to import raw psyllium husk sourced from India into Germany for further processing. In Germany, the psyllium husk is first sterilized by steam treatment at temperatures ranging from 60 to 120 degrees Celsius. After sterilization, the psyllium husk is grinded and milled into a fine powder. The finished product is then packaged and shipped to the United States, where it will be sold at retail for human consumption at the time of importation with an intended use as an additive to food ingredients.

Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), provides that unless excepted, every article of foreign origin imported into the United States shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the United States, the English name of the country of origin of the article. Congressional intent in enacting 19 U.S.C. 1304 was “that the ultimate purchaser should be able to know by an inspection of the marking on the imported goods the country of which the goods is the product. The evident purpose is to mark the goods so that at the time of purchase the ultimate purchaser may, by knowing where the goods were produced, be able to buy or refuse to buy them, if such marking should influence his will.” See United States v. Friedlaender & Co., 27 C.C.P.A. 297, 302 (1940).

Part 134 of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) Regulations (19 CFR 134) implements the country of origin marking requirements and exceptions of 19 U.S.C. 1304. Section 134.1(b), CBP Regulations (19 CFR 134.1(b)), defines “country of origin” as the country of manufacture, production, or growth of any article of foreign origin entering the United States. Further work or material added to an article in another country must effect a substantial transformation in order to render such other country the “country of origin” within the meaning of the marking laws and regulations.

A substantial transformation occurs when, as a result of manufacturing process, a new and different article emerges, having a distinct name, character or use, which is different from that originally possessed by the article or material before being subjected to the manufacturing process. See United States v. Gibson-Thomsen Co., Inc., 27 C.C.P.A. 267 (C.A.D. 98) (1940).

In this case, the manufacturing process performed in Germany, which consists of sterilization, milling, and grinding the psyllium husk into a powder would not effect a substantial transformation. The operations that are performed in Germany do not create an article with a new name, character, or use different from that possessed by the article prior to processing. Accordingly, the finished good is a product of India. Therefore, the product label must be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and permanently as the nature of the containers will permit to indicate that the psyllium husk fiber is "Made in," "Product of," or other words of similar meaning, India.

The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2. Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic verification by CBP.

This merchandise is subject to The Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (The Bioterrorism Act), which is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Information on the Bioterrorism Act can be obtained by calling the FDA at 301-575-0156, or at the Web site www.fda.gov/oc/bioterrorism/bioact.html.

This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (19 C.F.R. Part 177).

A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact National Import Specialist Christopher Gangaprashad at [email protected].
Sincerely,

(for)
Denise Faingar
Designated Official Performing the Duties of the Division Director
National Commodity Specialist Division