OT:RR:71:NC:N4:441
David Murphy, Esq.
GDLSK
599 Lexington Avenue, 36th Floor
New York, NY 10022
RE: The origin, marking, and eligibility under subheading 9802.00.5060 on gold jewelry.
Dear Mr. Murphy:
In your letter dated August 29, 2025, you requested a ruling on behalf of your client, HK Designs NY Inc.
You submitted photographs, product description, and manufacturing information on gold jewelry for our
review.
Style RE29622-4WLS2KA is a 14K white gold lab grown 2.50 cwt. round diamond ring.
Style RS07303-4YLVSKA is a 14K yellow gold lab grown 1.55 cwt. diamond cathedral ring.
Style LES00949-4WLS2KA is pair of lab grown 3.00 cwt. diamond solitaire earrings.
Style BT00612-4WLS2ZS is a 14K white gold lab created 2.00 cwt. diamond bracelet, buttercup s
etting.
Style S-EF31019-4WESKA is a pair of lab grown 0.50 cwt. diamond solitaire earrings.
The manufacturing steps performed in the United States are as follows:
Ring designed
Wax model created
Spruing, investing, and wax burnout performed
Metal is cast into the jewelry
Sprue cutting
The manufacturing steps performed in India are as follows:
Pre-finishing and tumbling
Gems are set
Polish and buffing
The applicable subheading for Styles RE29622-4WLS2KA, RS07303-4YLVSKA, LES00949-4WLS2KA,
BT00612-4WLS2ZS and S-EF31019-4WESKA will be 7113.19.50, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS), which provides for “Articles of jewelry and parts thereof, of precious metal or of
metal clad with precious metal: Of other precious metal, whether or not plated or clad with precious metal.”
The general rate of duty will be 5.5% ad valorem.
Your request also concerns the eligibility of the jewelry under subheading 9802.00.5060, HTSUS.
Subheading 9802.00.5060, HTSUS, provides a partial or complete duty exemption for articles returned to the
U.S. after having been exported to be advanced in value or improved in condition by any process of
manufacture or other means, provided that the documentary requirements of Section 10, Customs
Regulations (19 CFR 10.8) are satisfied. Pursuant to 19 CFR 10.8, the importer must submit a declaration
executed by the person who performed the repairs or alterations and a declaration of his own containing
various attestations. Articles eligible under subheading 9802.00.5060 are subject to duty upon the value of
the repairs, alterations, processing, or otherwise changes in condition abroad, pursuant to Note 3 to
Subchapter II, Chapter 98, HTSUS.
We find the described foreign processing acceptable for the purpose of subheading 9802.00.5060, HTSUS.
Accordingly, upon reimportation, the gold diamond earrings, bracelet and rings will be eligible for tariff
treatment under 9802.00.5060, HTSUS, provided the documentary requirements of 19 CFR 10.8 are satisfied.
You have also inquired about the country of origin of the above-described jewelry. When determining the
country of origin, the substantial transformation analysis is applicable. See, e.g., Headquarters Ruling Letter
(HQ) H301619, dated November 6, 2018. The test for determining whether a substantial transformation will
occur is whether an article emerges from a process with a new name, character, or use different from that
possessed by the article prior to processing. See Texas Instruments Inc. v. U.S., 681 F.2d 778 (C.C.P.A.
1982). This determination is based on the totality of the evidence. See National Hand Tool Corp. v. U.S., 16
C.I.T. 308 (1992), aff’d, 989 F.2d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 1993).
You proposed that the country of origin of the jewelry is the United States. We agree. The casting of the gold
jewerly in the United States provides the essence of the finished products. Setting the gems and performing
final finishing does not substantially transform the castings. As a result, the country of origin of the bracelet
is the United States. Therefore, the finished jewelry will be considered a product of the United States for
marking purposes and for purposes of trade remedies. Since the country of origin will be the United States,
the gold diamond earrings, bracelet and rings will be excepted from country of origin marking requirements
and will not be subject to additional trade remedy measures, such as reciprocal or global tariffs. The tariffs
and additional duties cited above are current as of this ruling’s issuance.
The holding set forth above applies only to the specific factual situation and merchandise description as
identified in the ruling request. This position is clearly set forth in Title 19, Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), Section 177.9(b)(1). This section states that a ruling letter is issued on the assumption that all of the
information furnished in the ruling letter, whether directly, by reference, or by implication, is accurate and
complete in every material respect. In the event that the facts are modified in any way, or if the goods do not
conform to these facts at time of importation, you should bring this to the attention of U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) and submit a request for a new ruling in accordance with 19 CFR 177.2.
Additionally, we note that the material facts described in the foregoing ruling may be subject to periodic
verification by CBP.
This ruling is being issued under the provisions of Part 177 of the Customs and Border Protection
Regulations (19 C.F.R. 177).
A copy of the ruling or the control number indicated above should be provided with the entry documents
filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If you have any questions regarding the ruling, please contact
National Import Specialist Vikki Lazaro at [email protected].
Sincerely,
(for)
Denise Faingar
Designated Official Performing the Duties of the Division Director
National Commodity Specialist Division