CLA-2 CO:R:C:S 557248 RAH

Area Director
U.S. Customs Service
J.F.K. Airport
Building 178
Jamaica, New York 11430

RE: Internal Advice No. 24/93; applicability of certain active ingredients used to make pharmaceutical samples for duty-free treatment under subheading 9811.00.60, HTSUS; detrimental reliance

Dear Sir:

This is in response to your memorandum of March 11, 1993, forwarding a Request for Internal Advice dated February 9, 1993, from counsel for SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals ("SKB").

FACTS:

SKB manufactures pharmaceuticals in the U.S. and Puerto Rico. The active ingredients for these drugs, which are sourced from the parent company in the United Kingdom, comprise from 70 to 96 percent of the value of the finished drug. The active ingredients are imported in bulk in drums, and a portion of each of the subject entries is designated for production of sample drugs to be distributed free to physicians, hospitals and other health care providers. Counsel contends that SKB is capable of maintaining the identification of the lots designated for sample production throughout the production process due to a highly sophisticated computerized inventory control system maintained to ensure compliance with FDA regulations. The bulk ingredients are mixed with some inactive excipients, which function as preservative and adhesive agents and are either milled into tablets and packaged or packaged in oral suspension form as a powder. Counsel states that the sample package is clearly marked as a complementary sample not for sale.

SKB argues that, to ensure that the samples in question would not be distributed through regular commercial channels, it could mark the particular drum or quantity as for sample production only, and through the manufacturing and packaging process, the lot or quantity so identified would be used only for the production of the samples. SKB further advises that it would provide documentation that the exact amount declared as destined for sample production was, in fact, so used and distributed.

Finally, if we find that the articles in question are not entitled to duty-free treatment under subheading 9811.00.60, HTSUS, SKB requests that this ruling be applied to its unliquidated entries from the date of Customs' Notice of Action (CF 29), proposing to rate advance SKB's unliquidated entries (November 3, 1992) onward. SKB stopped making entry under subheading 9811.00.60, HTSUS, as of the date of the Notice of Action. SKB began importing active ingredients under subheading 9811.00.60, HTSUS, in September, 1991.

ISSUE:

Whether the imported active ingredients used to make pharmaceutical samples will be entitled to free entry as samples for soliciting orders for foreign products under subheading 9811.00.60, HTSUS.

LAW AND ANALYSIS: Subheading 9811.00.60, HTSUS, provides for the free entry of any sample valued not over $1.00 each, or marked, torn, perforated, or otherwise treated so that it is unsuitable for sale or for use otherwise than as a sample, to be used in the U.S. only for soliciting orders for products of foreign countries.

In Headquarters Ruling Letter (HRL) 555619 dated October 29, 1990, prescriptive pharmaceutical tablets were imported in bulk and repackaged for distribution as samples. We held that tablets imported in bulk and not individually marked or treated in some way to distinguish them from standard merchandise could not be considered "samples" within subheading 9811.00.60, HTSUS. We further held that the mere marking of the outer container of the bulk merchandise would not be sufficient to ensure that the tablets are rendered "unsuitable for sale or for use otherwise than as a sample" since the tablets could be distributed through regular commercial channels and not used as samples for taking orders.

We also held that if the tablets in their condition as imported are individually marked "Sample," they could be treated as samples and eligible for free entry under subheading 9811.00.60, HTSUS, upon proof that they will be distributed to physicians to give to their patients in order to stimulate future orders of the foreign product. In the instant case, as in HRL 555619, we find that the mere marking of the outer container or drum as for "sample production only" is not sufficient to ensure that the finished product is unsuitable for sale or for use otherwise than as a sample. In addition, the ingredients as imported are not the same article that will be distributed as samples for soliciting orders for products of foreign countries. Accordingly, the ingredients imported in bulk in drums will not be eligible for duty-free treatment under subheading 9811.00.60, HTSUS, upon importation into the U.S.

Next, we will address the secondary claim of detrimental reliance. According to the regulations, Customs will from time to time issue a ruling letter covering a transaction or issue not previously the subject of a ruling letter and which has the effect of modifying the treatment previously accorded by Customs to substantially identical transactions of either the recipient of the ruling letter or other parties. See 19 CFR 177.9(e)(1). Pursuant to the regulations, Customs may, upon application by an affected party, delay the effective date of a ruling letter and continue the treatment previously accorded the substantially identical transaction, for a period of up to 90 days from the date a ruling letter is issued. See 19 CFR 177.9(e)(1). In applying to the Customs Service for a delay in the effective date of a ruling letter, an affected party must demonstrate to the satisfaction of Customs that he reasonably relied upon treatment previously accorded by Customs to substantially identical transactions over a period of at least two years. See 19 CFR 177.9(e)(2).

The 43 unliquidated entries which are affected by this decision were filed during the period December 31, 1991, through October, 1992. Counsel advises that 40 identical entries filed between September, 1991 to October, 1992, were liquidated duty free under subheading 9811.00.60, HTSUS. SKB is requesting that this ruling letter be applied from November 3, 1992 (the date of the Notice of Action), onward to accord the unliquidated entries filed prior to that date the same treatment given to contemporaneous entries which were liquidated duty free.

Although SKB is not requesting a delay in the effective date of this ruling for a period from the date of issuance, it is, in effect, requesting that the effective date of this ruling be delayed from December 31, 1991 (the date the first unliquidated entry was filed) to November 3, 1992. Thus, we believe that, as stated in 19 CFR 177.9(e)(1), SKB must demonstrate to our satisfaction that it reasonable relied upon treatment previously accorded by Customs to substantially identical transactions over a period of at least two years. The entries in this case which were liquidated duty free do not cover a two-year period prior to the date of notification by Customs that the entries were dutiable. Therefore, we conclude that your detrimental reliance claim should be denied.

HOLDING:

Active ingredients imported in bulk in drums marked for sample production only, and which are later manufactured into finished drugs that will be distributed as samples, are not entitled to free entry under subheading 9811.00.60, HTSUS, since the ingredients as imported are not the same articles that will be distributed as samples for soliciting orders for products of foreign countries.

Sincerely,

John Durant, Director