CLA-2 CO:R:C:T 950681 HP
Ms. Christy Miller
Customs Administrator
Nike, Inc.
One Bowerman Drive
Beaverton, OR 97005-6453
RE: Shorts; swimwear; Hampco; design; construction; tag; draw-
string; waistband; catalog; logo; advertising; volleyball; soccer
Dear Ms. Miller:
This is in reply to your letter of September 17, 1991, to
our New York Seaport office. That letter concerned the tariff
classification, under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States Annotated (HTSUSA), of shorts, produced in Thai-
land, Singapore and Taiwan.
FACTS:
The merchandise at issue consists of four samples of men's
shorts, style nos. 15099, 150064, 150065 and 150048. Styles
150099, 150064 and 150065 have woven shells of 100% nylon taffe-
ta, 100% nylon mesh liners, and inserted side seam pockets of
100% nylon mesh. Style 150064 has a shell of 100% nylon taffeta
and a knit lining of 65% polyester and 35% cotton. It has no
pockets. Each style has an elasticized waistband, a functional
drawstring, and a Nike corporate logo embroidered on the left
leg. The hang tags merely have the Nike logo.
In your letter, each sample is referred to as men's team
sales shorts. In your 1992 Spring catalog, style 150064 is
listed on page 219 as a soccer short. Style 15099 is displayed
in action shots within the magazine Volleyball Monthly. You ask
us to confirm previous pre-classifications of similar merchandise
as swimwear.
Page 2
ISSUE:
Whether the instant merchandise is considered swimwear or
active wear under the HTSUSA?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Heading 6211, HTSUSA, provides for, inter alia, men's and
boys' swimwear. The Explanatory Notes (EN) to the HTSUSA consti-
tute the official interpretation of the tariff at the interna-
tional level. While not legally binding, they do represent the
considered views of classification experts of the Harmonized
System Committee. It has therefore been the practice of the
Customs Service to follow, whenever possible, the terms of the
Explanatory Notes when interpreting the HTSUSA. The EN to
heading 6112, which applies, mutatis mutandis, to heading 6211,
describes swimwear as "(...one-piece or two-piece bathing cos-
tumes, swimming shorts and trunks, whether or not elastic)." The
instant merchandise seems to meet this broad definition.
In Hampco Apparel, Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 88-12
(January 28, 1988), the Court of International Trade stated that
three factors must be present if a garment is to be considered
swimwear for tariff purposes:
(1) The garment has an elasticized waistband through which
a drawstring is threaded,
(2) the garment has an inner lining of lightweight materi-
al, and
(3) the garment is designed and constructed for swimming.
The instant shorts have the first two factors listed above. They
could be used for swimming. We therefore must decide if they are
"designed and constructed for swimming."
In HRL 081447 of March 21, 1988, we stated that, in order to
determine whether a garment is designed and constructed for
swimming, we would first look at the appearance of the garment.
If the appearance is inconclusive, as in the instant shorts,
evidence of the way in which the garment has been designed,
manufactured, marketed or advertised, the way in which the
manufacturer or importer intends the garment to be used, and the
way in which a garment is chiefly used will be considered.
In HRL 950602 of December 3, 1991, we classified similar
shorts as active wear shorts for uses other than swimwear, as
indicated by the embroidered sports logos (tennis balls, basket-
balls, Michael Jordan), the attached hang tags describing some of
the shorts as "fitness" apparel, and the placement of some of the
garments with clearly sports-oriented outerwear in your 1992
sales representatives sizing, policy and procedures manual. In
the instant matter, the shorts have no specific sports-oriented
logos. The hang tags do not aid us in determining marketing, and
you have asked us to confirm a classification as swimwear.
Conversely, you have submitted three volleyball magazines showing
style 15099 as used in the sport. Additionally, your catalog
describes style 150064 as soccer shorts.
It is our opinion the garments are properly classifiable as
swimwear. Even though the shorts are used in volleyball, and by
construction and design are virtually indistinguishable from
shorts previously classified as volleyball shorts, there exists
Page 3
no embroidered volleyball (or soccer) logo, no tag describing the
shorts as volleyball (or soccer) apparel, and no statement by you
that they are used to play volleyball and beach volleyball. See
HRL 086436 of May 3, 1990 (volleyball shorts). You state that
the volleyball magazines were submitted to show the shorts being
worn for various beach activities. Based upon the Hampco deci-
sion, supra, the instant shorts are correctly classified as
swimwear.
HOLDING:
As a result of the foregoing, the instant merchandise is
classified under subheading 6211.11.1010, HTSUSA, textile catego-
ry (659), as track suits, ski-suits and swimwear, other garments,
swimwear, men's or boys', of man-made fibers, men's. The appli-
cable rate of duty is 29.6 percent ad valorem.
The designated textile and apparel category may be subdivid-
ed into parts. If so, visa and quota requirements applicable to
the subject merchandise may be affected. Since part categories
are the result of international bilateral agreements which are
subject to frequent negotiations and changes, to obtain the most
current information available, we suggest that you check, close
to the time of shipment, the Status Report On Current Import
Quotas (Restraint Levels), an issuance of the U.S. Customs
Service, which is updated weekly and is available at your local
Customs office.
Due to the changeable nature of the statistical annotation
(the ninth and tenth digits of the classification) and the
restraint (quota/visa) categories, you should contact your local
Customs office prior to importing the merchandise to determine
the current status of any import restraints or requirements.
A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry
documents filed at the time this merchandise is imported. If the
documents have been filed without a copy, this ruling should be
brought to the attention of the Customs officer handling the
transaction.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division