CLA-2; CO:R:C:T 950281 ch
Michael Smerling
L.C. Industries, Inc.
1650 W. Irving Park Road
Chicago, IL 60613
RE: Revocation of NYRL 858166; tariff classification of shoe
protector bags from China under Heading 6307, not 4202; shoe
pouch; shoe bag; article used for storage/protection, not travel.
Dear Mr. Smerling:
New York Ruling Letter (NYRL) 858166, dated November 5,
1990, concerned the classification of shoe protector bags under
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated
(HTSUSA). We have had occasion to review this ruling and find
that the classification of said merchandise under Subheading
4202.92.3030, HTSUSA, is in error.
FACTS:
The merchandise at issue are shoe protector bags designed to
store shoes, or protect them during travel. They are closed by
means of a cotton rope-like drawstring.
In NYRL 858166, this merchandise was classified under
Subheading 4202.92.3030, HTSUSA, which provides for travel,
sports and similar bags, with outer surface of textile materials.
ISSUE:
Whether the subject merchandise is properly classified under
Subheading 4202.92, which provides for travel, sports and similar
bags, or Subheading 6307.99, which provides for other made-up
textile articles?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Classification of goods under the HTSUSA is governed by the
General Rules of Interpretation (GRI). GRI 1 provides that
classification is determined first in accordance with the terms
of the headings of the tariff and any relative section or chapter
notes. Where goods cannot be classified on the basis of GRI 1,
the remaining GRI will be applied in order.
The Explanatory Notes (EN) to the Harmonized Commodity
Description and Coding System constitute the official
interpretation of the nomenclature at the international level.
While not legally binding, they do represent the considered views
of classification experts of the Harmonized System Committee. It
has therefore been the practice of the Customs Service to follow,
whenever possible, the terms of the EN when interpreting the
HTSUSA.
The EN to Heading 6307 state that it includes in particular:
(5) Domestic laundry or shoe bags, stocking,
handkerchief or slipper sachets, pyjama or
nightdress cases and similar articles.
(Emphasis added).
(6) Garment bags (portable wardrobes) other than
those of heading 42.02.
Thus, it is clear that shoe bags are to be treated as other made
up articles. Moreover, the exemplars contained in (5) and (6)
suggest that there is a class of containers or bags used for
storing various personal effects which are not covered more
specifically in Section XI or elsewhere in the Nomenclature.
On the other hand, Chapter 42, HTSUSA, specifically
encompasses travel goods. Heading 4202 describes containers
commonly used to transport personal effects. These items
include:
Trunks, Suit-Cases, Vanity-Cases, Executive-Cases,
Briefcases, School Satchels, Spectacle Cases, Binocular
Cases, Camera Cases, Musical Instrument Cases, Gun
Cases, Holsters and Similar Containers; Travelling-
Bags, Toilet Bags, Rucksacks, Handbags, Shopping-Bags,
Wallets, Purses, Map-Cases, Cigarette-Cases, Tobacco-
Pouches, Tool Bags, Sports Bags, Bottle-Cases,
Jewellery Boxes, Powder-Boxes, Cutlery Cases and
Similar Containers.
Unfortunately, these competing provisions may overlap. For
example, one may use a shoe bag as a protective sheath to protect
both shoes and other clothing articles during the course of
travel. Similarly, items such as cigarette cases and jewelry
boxes may be used as storage cases completely unrelated to their
use in travel. When these provisions overlap we must first rely
on the chapter headings and the EN to help us determine which
classification is proper for a particular item.
In this instance, the EN to Heading 6307 specifically state
that shoe bags are to be classified as other made up textile
articles. Hence, the subject merchandise is properly classified
under Heading 6307.
HOLDING:
The subject merchandise is classifiable under Subheading
6307.90.9986, HTSUSA, which provides for other made up articles,
other, other, other, other. The applicable rate of duty is 7% ad
valorem.
In order to insure uniformity in Customs classification of
this merchandise and eliminate uncertainty, we are revoking NYRL
858166. However, if after your review you disagree with the
legal basis for our decision, we invite you to submit any
arguments you might have with respect to this matter for our
review. Any submission you wish to make should be received
within 30 days of this letter.
This notice to you should be considered a revocation of NYRL
858166 under 19 CFR 177.9(d)(1). It is not to be applied
retroactively to NYRL 858166 (19 CFR 177.9(d)(2)) and will not,
therefore, affect past transactions for the importation of your
client's merchandise under that ruling. However, for the
purposes of future transactions in merchandise of this type, NYRL
858166 will not be valid precedent. We recognize that pending
transactions may be adversely affected by this modification, in
that current contracts for importations arriving at a port
subsequent to this decision will be classified pursuant to it.
If such a situation arises, your client may, at its discretion,
notify this office and apply for relief from the binding effects
of this decision as may be warranted by the circumstances.
However, please be advised that in some instances involving
import restraints, such relief may require separate approvals
from other government agencies.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director