CLA-2 CO:R:C:G 084424 CMR 839778
Ms. Hillary Hardy
Playknits, Inc.
240 West 40th Street
New York, New York 10018
RE: Classification of a women's cotton/rayon dress
Dear Ms. Hardy:
This ruling is in response to your letter of April 17, 1989,
requesting the classification of a women's cotton/rayon dress.
FACTS:
The dress at issue, style #5570, is one-piece and has a 100
percent cotton woven velveteen bodice with 100 percent rayon printed
challis long sleeves and a 100 percent rayon printed challis skirt.
Overall, the rayon is 60 percent by weight, the cotton 40 percent.
The dress features a dropped waist, round neckline without collar,
and a zipper closure in the back.
The dress will be imported from the Philippines.
ISSUE:
Is the dress classifiable as "of cotton" or as "of synthetic
fibers"?
Is the classification determination based on which fiber
predominates by weight or according to which fabric imparts the
essential character, insofar as that is determinable?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
HRL 083925 of June 9, 1989, stated that "where separate fabrics
are combined to form a textile garment or article, GRI 3 is utilized
first to select which fabric will determine [the] classification."
-2-
Therefore, since the dress at issue is made of two different fabrics,
it is necessary to apply GRI 3(b) to select the fabric by which it
should be classified.
Determination of essential character is understandably diffi-
cult. In an effort to ease that difficulty and inject objectivity
and uniformity into the determination, Customs has issued a
Memorandum to the Area Director, New York Seaport, File #084118 of
April 13, 1989 (copy attached), establishing criteria to be applied
in the classification of garments consisting of different fabrics or
of textile and nontextile components.
In the case of full body garments, the memorandum states:
that component which comprises the visible upper portion will
determine the classification; however, classification will be
according to GRI 3(b) or 3(c), as appropriate, if the other
component:
(1) provides a significant visual effect (e.g. a
substantial amount of lace); or
(2) is over 60 percent by weight of the garment; or
(3) is valued at more than 2 times the primary component.
In the instant case, the upper portion of the garment is
comprised of both fabrics. The velveteen bodice is the major
portion, however the challis print long sleeves cannot be ignored.
Additionally, the challis print skirt portion of the dress does
provide a significant visual effect and, while it is not over 60
percent by weight of the garment, it is 60 percent by weight of the
garment. Taking these factors into consideration, we believe we must
decide whether it is possible to determine which fabric imparts the
essential character of the dress.
Considering the styling of the dress and the visual impact of
both fabrics, we cannot maintain that either one imparts the
essential character of the garment; they both do. Since we cannot
claim one fabric gives the garment its essential character, we must
resort to GRI 3(c).
Under GRI 3(c), we classify the garment according to that
heading which occurs last in the HTSUSA from among those under
consideration.
HOLDING:
The dress at issue is classified under the provision for women's
dresses of artificial fibers, subheading 6204.44.4010, HTSUSA,
textile category 636, dutiable at 17 percent ad valorem.
-3-
Due to the changeable nature of the statistical annotation (the
ninth and tenth digits of the classification) and the restraint
(quota/visa) categories, you should contact your local Customs office
prior to importation of this merchandise to determine the current
status of any import restraints or requirements.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
6cc: Area Director, New York Seaport
1cc: CITA
1cc: Legal Reference Section
1cc: Phil Robins