CLA-2:CO:R:C:G   082183 JAS
Kent K. Matsumoto, Esq.
             Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver
             10 Light Street
             Baltimore, Maryland 21202
             RE: Country of Origin of Abrasion Resistant Steel Pipe
                 Processed in Canada From Pipe Sourced in the U.K.
             Dear Mr. Matsumoto:
                 In your letter of April 15, 1988, you inquire as to the
             country of origin, for tariff purposes, of steel pipe from the
             United Kingdom which is induction heated and water quenched in
             Canada to form abrasion resistant steel pipe.  Our ruling
             follows.
             FACTS:
                 The specialty pipe to be imported from Canada is abrasion
             resistant steel pipe for use in hydraulic slurry and pneumatic
             conveyance systems.  The pipe is processed in Canada from an
             "unfinished" high carbon steel pipe (referred to as NASP 40)
             produced in the U.K. according to rigid specifications set by
             the Canadian processor.  The processing operation in Canada,
             which results in a product called NASP 600, is a heat treat-
             ment consisting of the following:
                      1.    Heating to the austenitizing temperature range
                            (1,500 degrees fahrenheit) by means of
                            induction coils.
                      2.    Water-quenching of the inner wall by a system
                            using a lance fitted with a sprayer head.
                      3.    Quality assurance testing for hardness and
                            ovality, and for camber and performance under
                            hydrostatic conditions.
                      4.    Supplementary fabrication, if required.
- 2 -
                 The Canadian processing results in a product, NASP 600,
             that is worth approximately three and one-half times the cost
             of the NASP 40 from the U.K.  The heat treatment is very time-
             consuming, and takes about eight hours to process 600 feet of
             pipe.  The process changes the microstructure of the pipe from
             ferrite/pearlite to 100% martensitic, which gives it the
             mechanical properties necessary for durability and abrasion
             resistance in slurry systems.
                 The mechanical properties of the unfinished pipe and the
             heat treated pipe are as follows:
                PROPERTY               UNFINISHED       HEAT TREATED
                Yield Strength         40-60            900-125
                Ultimate Strength      75-100           300+
                Ductility (elongation) App. 20%         App. 10%
                Hardness               200-240 BHN      600+ BHN
                Charpy V-Notch         Avg. 15-20 Joule   4 Joule
             ISSUE:
                 Has the described processing substantially transformed the
             pipe of U.K. origin into a product of Canada for tariff
             purposes?
             LAW AND ANALYSIS:
                 An article is a product of the country in which it was
             last subject to a substantial transformation.  The record must
             establish that the Canadian processing resulted in a product
             other than or materially different from the merchandise of
             U.K. origin; that is, a new and different article must emerge
             from the processing, one having a new name, character or use.
             Anheuser-Busch Brewing Association v. United States, 207 U.S.
             556 (1908).
                 The "unfinished" pipe from the U.K., as you state, is made
             to rigid specifications for the Canadian processor, and has no
             use in the U.K. or Canada as pipe.  In fact, it is not used by
             anyone in the industry, other than the Canadian processor.
             The processing, however, specially adapts the pipe for use in
             pneumatic conveyance systems for slurry and other abrasive
             materials.  In a ruling, dated November 21, 1985 (file
             553739), we held that quenching and tempering of multifunc-
             tional pipe in order to change it into pipe that meets A.P.I.
- 3 -
             specifications for oil country tubular goods, together with
             the end finishing of the pipe, was a substantial transforma-
             tion.
                 The heat treatment you describe results in a product that
             has a new character and use.  Even though prior to the Cana-
             dian heat treatment process the pipe is said to be limited in
             use to finishing into special abrasion-resistant pipe, the
             actual processing requires significant time and critical con-
             trol in order to impart the specific quality of surface hard-
             ness that is required for hydraulic slurry pipe systems.  The
             processing significantly changes the microstructure of the
             steel in the pipe.  The heat treatment, together with the
             existing chemical composition of the pipe, changes the physi-
             cal properties of the pipe to meet the specialized require-
             ments of a piping system that must withstand the effects of
             highly abrasive materials that are pumped in the hydraulic
             slurry and pneumatic conveyance systems.
                 This specialized use is indicative of a change in the
             character of the pipe.  While there has been no significant
             visible change in the dimensions of the pipe, there have been
             significant changes in its mechanical properties so as to
             identify this pipe as a particular type of limited-use pipe.
             There is no indication that this pipe has any other applica-
             tion.
             HOLDING:
                 The heat treatment process, as described, results in a new
             and different article which is considered a product of Canada
             for tariff purposes.
                                        Sincerely,
John Durant
                                        Director, Commercial
                                        Rulings Division