Pg. 1 of 6 • 52 results

Application for Further Review of Protest 4601-03-102840 Dear Port Director: This is in reply to your correspondence forwarding Application for Further Review of Protest (AFR) 4601-03-102840, filed by Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz, Silverman & Klestadt, LLP, on behalf of Oved Apparel. In written submissions and in a telephone conference between members of my staff and counsel for the protestant on January 6, 2004, the protestant claims the subject merchandise is eligible for preferential treatment under the AGOA. The protest is against Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) classification of eight entries of men’s and boy’s knit pullovers under subheadings 6110.20.2065 and men’s knit shirts under subheading 6105.10.0010 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).

The tariff classification of a bandanna from China.

The tariff classification of handkerchief set from China.

The tariff classification of bandanas from China/India.

The tariff classification of handkerchiefs from China.

The tariff classification of a bandana from China.

The tariff classification of a bandana from India.

The tariff classification of a bandana from China.

The tariff classification of bandanas from China.

Request for Administrative Review; Reconsideration and Revocation of NY G82728: Woven cotton handkerchiefs with decorative design in contrasting stitching

Pg. 1 of 6 • 52 results